<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radiohead&#8217;s LP8 (And Thom Yorke&#8217;s LP2?): What We Know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/02/radioheads-lp8-and-thom-yorkes-lp2-what-we-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/02/radioheads-lp8-and-thom-yorkes-lp2-what-we-know/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/02/radioheads-lp8-and-thom-yorkes-lp2-what-we-know/comment-page-1/#comment-46802</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5245#comment-46802</guid>
		<description>it was in response to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was in response to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/02/radioheads-lp8-and-thom-yorkes-lp2-what-we-know/comment-page-1/#comment-46801</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5245#comment-46801</guid>
		<description>you beat the &#039;gum to it...congrats are in order</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you beat the &#8216;gum to it&#8230;congrats are in order</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uptight</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/02/radioheads-lp8-and-thom-yorkes-lp2-what-we-know/comment-page-1/#comment-46627</link>
		<dc:creator>uptight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5245#comment-46627</guid>
		<description>Nice one, someone needed to do this... :-D I sense that the ????? thingy is going to yield something more substantial than just gigs full of 4-year-old material (great as it is). And that we might see a RH release late in the year. Other than that... It&#039;s probably good we know so few about the songs this time. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one, someone needed to do this&#8230; <img src='http://www.rawkblog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  I sense that the ????? thingy is going to yield something more substantial than just gigs full of 4-year-old material (great as it is). And that we might see a RH release late in the year. Other than that&#8230; It&#8217;s probably good we know so few about the songs this time. <img src='http://www.rawkblog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

