<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Bands You Can Ignore #2: M.I.A.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/comment-page-1/#comment-48948</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5004#comment-48948</guid>
		<description>BITCH PLEASE, Vampire Weekend sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BITCH PLEASE, Vampire Weekend sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/comment-page-1/#comment-47554</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5004#comment-47554</guid>
		<description>BITCH PLEASE, Vampire Weekend sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BITCH PLEASE, Vampire Weekend sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.P.</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/comment-page-1/#comment-42557</link>
		<dc:creator>J.P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5004#comment-42557</guid>
		<description>&quot;She’s a terrible vocalist. Can’t rap, can’t sing. She’s a provocative lyricist and an occasionally interesting producer; music-wise, that’s about it&quot;

....and yet you&#039;re gush-crushing everyday for Joanna. Fucking. Newsome?! The irony inherent there should cause this site to fold in upon itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;She’s a terrible vocalist. Can’t rap, can’t sing. She’s a provocative lyricist and an occasionally interesting producer; music-wise, that’s about it&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;.and yet you&#8217;re gush-crushing everyday for Joanna. Fucking. Newsome?! The irony inherent there should cause this site to fold in upon itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/comment-page-1/#comment-42170</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5004#comment-42170</guid>
		<description>@Pantha Basically: She&#039;s a terrible vocalist. Can&#039;t rap, can&#039;t sing. She&#039;s a provocative lyricist and an occasionally interesting producer; music-wise, that&#039;s about it. #ignore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pantha Basically: She&#8217;s a terrible vocalist. Can&#8217;t rap, can&#8217;t sing. She&#8217;s a provocative lyricist and an occasionally interesting producer; music-wise, that&#8217;s about it. #ignore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ariel</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/comment-page-1/#comment-42164</link>
		<dc:creator>ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5004#comment-42164</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s just such a lame topic for a post.  it&#039;s SO EASY to hate on something and does nothing relevant in informing anyone about anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s just such a lame topic for a post.  it&#8217;s SO EASY to hate on something and does nothing relevant in informing anyone about anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pantha</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/comment-page-1/#comment-42163</link>
		<dc:creator>pantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5004#comment-42163</guid>
		<description>i guess you&#039;re trying trying to suggest that people like the &quot;idea&quot; of M.I.A. — third world rapper, omg! — more than the songs themselves, which is fair. but even as a fan, i&#039;m not immune to the (often obnoxious) way the media handles her, nor the ways she plays into that treatment. it&#039;s almost impossible to divorce her music from world context, so if you have a knee-jerk reaction against her then you may never find a &quot;compelling&quot; case.

that said, i still think the music speaks for itself. she does a whole lot to equalize genres that people typically view with artificial barriers, and the attitude of her approach is nearly inscrutable. she knows that the sounds she&#039;s making will fundamentally appeal to the same audience she&#039;s trying to subvert, so there&#039;s an extreme tension behind every song that keeps them re-listenable and propulsive — much like the classic pop formula does. she&#039;s able to smuggle ostensibly &quot;fringe&quot; ideas/sounds/etc. by co-opting the mainstream model, making them danceable, etc.

(as a loose comparison, film theorists make a similar argument re: Douglas Sirk&#039;s melodramas. he gives his audience the chance to radically encounter their own fears, but it&#039;s done within the guise of a popular form.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess you&#8217;re trying trying to suggest that people like the &#8220;idea&#8221; of M.I.A. — third world rapper, omg! — more than the songs themselves, which is fair. but even as a fan, i&#8217;m not immune to the (often obnoxious) way the media handles her, nor the ways she plays into that treatment. it&#8217;s almost impossible to divorce her music from world context, so if you have a knee-jerk reaction against her then you may never find a &#8220;compelling&#8221; case.</p>
<p>that said, i still think the music speaks for itself. she does a whole lot to equalize genres that people typically view with artificial barriers, and the attitude of her approach is nearly inscrutable. she knows that the sounds she&#8217;s making will fundamentally appeal to the same audience she&#8217;s trying to subvert, so there&#8217;s an extreme tension behind every song that keeps them re-listenable and propulsive — much like the classic pop formula does. she&#8217;s able to smuggle ostensibly &#8220;fringe&#8221; ideas/sounds/etc. by co-opting the mainstream model, making them danceable, etc.</p>
<p>(as a loose comparison, film theorists make a similar argument re: Douglas Sirk&#8217;s melodramas. he gives his audience the chance to radically encounter their own fears, but it&#8217;s done within the guise of a popular form.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/comment-page-1/#comment-42156</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5004#comment-42156</guid>
		<description>Pantha, I would love it if you could make a compelling case for M.I.A.&#039;s music -- not M.I.A. -- as being &quot;relevant/important.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pantha, I would love it if you could make a compelling case for M.I.A.&#8217;s music &#8212; not M.I.A. &#8212; as being &#8220;relevant/important.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pantha</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2010/01/2010-bands-you-can-ignore-2-m-i-a/comment-page-1/#comment-42155</link>
		<dc:creator>pantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=5004#comment-42155</guid>
		<description>love your website in general, but yeah, this is dumb. there&#039;s an argument to be made re: yeasayer but M.I.A. is clearly one of the most &#039;relevant&#039;/&#039;important&#039; artists of our time. even if you personally can&#039;t get into the music, it&#039;s naive to dismiss her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love your website in general, but yeah, this is dumb. there&#8217;s an argument to be made re: yeasayer but M.I.A. is clearly one of the most &#8216;relevant&#8217;/'important&#8217; artists of our time. even if you personally can&#8217;t get into the music, it&#8217;s naive to dismiss her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

