<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Talk On The State Of Music Criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/11/real-talk-on-the-state-of-music-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/11/real-talk-on-the-state-of-music-criticism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/11/real-talk-on-the-state-of-music-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-33635</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4582#comment-33635</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s depressing that Pitchfork can still make or break a band. And Stereogum? I do check it daily, but there&#039;s usually maybe one thing out of all the day&#039;s posts that is even remotely of interest--I don&#039;t give two shits about Zooey Deschanel and Ben Gibbard getting married. And I agree with you about its audience...while it&#039;s very broad, it&#039;s also kinda ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s depressing that Pitchfork can still make or break a band. And Stereogum? I do check it daily, but there&#8217;s usually maybe one thing out of all the day&#8217;s posts that is even remotely of interest&#8211;I don&#8217;t give two shits about Zooey Deschanel and Ben Gibbard getting married. And I agree with you about its audience&#8230;while it&#8217;s very broad, it&#8217;s also kinda ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/11/real-talk-on-the-state-of-music-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-33326</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4582#comment-33326</guid>
		<description>And frankly I think Stereogum&#039;s great. Its audience is the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And frankly I think Stereogum&#8217;s great. Its audience is the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/11/real-talk-on-the-state-of-music-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-33325</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4582#comment-33325</guid>
		<description>In many ways, even if the writing were to really elevate itself, I think they&#039;ve painted themselves into a corner they&#039;ll never escape from. Which is fine. I think they&#039;re actually a generally positive thing in the indie-verse and they do a solid job of putting MP3s/reviews/videos/news in one spot -- the quality of all that is up for debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many ways, even if the writing were to really elevate itself, I think they&#8217;ve painted themselves into a corner they&#8217;ll never escape from. Which is fine. I think they&#8217;re actually a generally positive thing in the indie-verse and they do a solid job of putting MP3s/reviews/videos/news in one spot &#8212; the quality of all that is up for debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/11/real-talk-on-the-state-of-music-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-33319</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4582#comment-33319</guid>
		<description>Very true, that&#039;s why I don&#039;t visit Pitchfork anymore, they only anger me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true, that&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t visit Pitchfork anymore, they only anger me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

