<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critical Backlash: The &#8220;Death&#8221; Of The Album</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/comment-page-1/#comment-46341</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4019#comment-46341</guid>
		<description>Great comments, but I over the 35 years I have listened to radio and bought albums, rarely - very rarely is there an album that can be listened to in its entirety over and over and over again. Yes there are a few, but even the best acts have trouble consistently packaging 10-14 really great songs together, much less in a manner that evokes a really great listening experience.

The &quot;death of the album&quot; should be argued from the current &quot;tweens&quot; point of view. Most of my friends are parents of teenagers. All are inseparable from their ipods, zunes, and bit torrent clients. I do not know of one of them who obtains their music legally or otherwise that listens to full albums. The closest they come is making a playlist of their favorite artist&#039;s best songs.

I would argue many who are still clinging to the album (even in digital format) are of a certain age who grew up with the album concept as their experience. The real test of the album will come as this generation who was raised on digital media chooses to embrace or not embrace the &quot;digital album.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments, but I over the 35 years I have listened to radio and bought albums, rarely &#8211; very rarely is there an album that can be listened to in its entirety over and over and over again. Yes there are a few, but even the best acts have trouble consistently packaging 10-14 really great songs together, much less in a manner that evokes a really great listening experience.</p>
<p>The &#8220;death of the album&#8221; should be argued from the current &#8220;tweens&#8221; point of view. Most of my friends are parents of teenagers. All are inseparable from their ipods, zunes, and bit torrent clients. I do not know of one of them who obtains their music legally or otherwise that listens to full albums. The closest they come is making a playlist of their favorite artist&#8217;s best songs.</p>
<p>I would argue many who are still clinging to the album (even in digital format) are of a certain age who grew up with the album concept as their experience. The real test of the album will come as this generation who was raised on digital media chooses to embrace or not embrace the &#8220;digital album.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/comment-page-1/#comment-30671</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4019#comment-30671</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting! Hope to see you around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting! Hope to see you around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briss</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/comment-page-1/#comment-30668</link>
		<dc:creator>Briss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4019#comment-30668</guid>
		<description>Point totally taken and this is how i feel about the 30-40 minute package too, but i think that the itunes playlist, far from being the mixtape substitute is actually usurping the album as a soundtrack to the everyday. The immediacy of being able to drag and drop a 3 hr playlist together in 5 minutes and to tailor it to your needs at that specific point in time is a very seductive prospect, and it takes even more away from the album&#039;s relevance. But man i hope you&#039;re right. Thanks for the post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point totally taken and this is how i feel about the 30-40 minute package too, but i think that the itunes playlist, far from being the mixtape substitute is actually usurping the album as a soundtrack to the everyday. The immediacy of being able to drag and drop a 3 hr playlist together in 5 minutes and to tailor it to your needs at that specific point in time is a very seductive prospect, and it takes even more away from the album&#8217;s relevance. But man i hope you&#8217;re right. Thanks for the post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/comment-page-1/#comment-30656</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4019#comment-30656</guid>
		<description>This is a great comment and you make some smart points. However, I think in terms of future viability though a 30-40 minute collection still makes the most sense as a package - it can soundtrack a commute, a workout, dinner, etc, beyond just listening for pleasure. I think people will largely stick with it. I guess we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great comment and you make some smart points. However, I think in terms of future viability though a 30-40 minute collection still makes the most sense as a package &#8211; it can soundtrack a commute, a workout, dinner, etc, beyond just listening for pleasure. I think people will largely stick with it. I guess we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briss</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/comment-page-1/#comment-30654</link>
		<dc:creator>Briss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4019#comment-30654</guid>
		<description>You have represented the situation from a distinctly consumerist point of view but you are ignoring the further reaching implications of the dissection of an album into single downloadable songs. 

The broader question is: when people are able to download albums for free, how can artists survive and keep creating? Bands WILL stop making albums before too long. In my own region, that’s the trend. The cost of making an album was prohibitive at the best of times and now there is little-to-no prospect of recouping money through sales. Enter &quot;the Single Song Marketplace&quot;. Suddenly here is an ostensible life-line for struggling musicians. Why make a whole album when the framework is there to record singles and get the same returns?

You write of people buying fewer albums in relation to singles:

&quot;...this is because people are buying less albums, period, because, frankly: what’s the point when music’s free?&quot;

Of course this is true, but the single digital download market is exploiting this very grave situation at the ultimate expense of the album. 

The difference between the industry now and in &#039;96 when CD single sales were booming is that back then there wasn&#039;t a suffocating monster (free downloads) working in parallel with the CD single to bring down the album. In the mid nineties, CD album sales actually grew in tandem with CD single sales so i don&#039;t know if this is a very helpful comparison to draw with today&#039;s situation.  

I agree with you that people will continue to listen to albums but the problem doesn&#039;t lie with some theoretical lack of public interest in the form. The real changes are happening less at the consumer level where you’ve focused your argument, and more at the creative and production levels where the new economy is hamstringing artists&#039; ability to produce and develop. Yes, the huge bands that you&#039;ve referenced in your blog will probably keep making albums but down in the breeding grounds of music&#039;s next generation, the album is becoming an increasingly unworkable proposition. 

B

PS - By the inclusion of the signed Morrisey at the top there I’m guessing you are part of a generation who grew up with the album form being central to the cultural musical experience. The new wave of consumers, born directly into the world of high speed broadband, will have no such allegiance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have represented the situation from a distinctly consumerist point of view but you are ignoring the further reaching implications of the dissection of an album into single downloadable songs. </p>
<p>The broader question is: when people are able to download albums for free, how can artists survive and keep creating? Bands WILL stop making albums before too long. In my own region, that’s the trend. The cost of making an album was prohibitive at the best of times and now there is little-to-no prospect of recouping money through sales. Enter &#8220;the Single Song Marketplace&#8221;. Suddenly here is an ostensible life-line for struggling musicians. Why make a whole album when the framework is there to record singles and get the same returns?</p>
<p>You write of people buying fewer albums in relation to singles:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;this is because people are buying less albums, period, because, frankly: what’s the point when music’s free?&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course this is true, but the single digital download market is exploiting this very grave situation at the ultimate expense of the album. </p>
<p>The difference between the industry now and in &#8217;96 when CD single sales were booming is that back then there wasn&#8217;t a suffocating monster (free downloads) working in parallel with the CD single to bring down the album. In the mid nineties, CD album sales actually grew in tandem with CD single sales so i don&#8217;t know if this is a very helpful comparison to draw with today&#8217;s situation.  </p>
<p>I agree with you that people will continue to listen to albums but the problem doesn&#8217;t lie with some theoretical lack of public interest in the form. The real changes are happening less at the consumer level where you’ve focused your argument, and more at the creative and production levels where the new economy is hamstringing artists&#8217; ability to produce and develop. Yes, the huge bands that you&#8217;ve referenced in your blog will probably keep making albums but down in the breeding grounds of music&#8217;s next generation, the album is becoming an increasingly unworkable proposition. </p>
<p>B</p>
<p>PS &#8211; By the inclusion of the signed Morrisey at the top there I’m guessing you are part of a generation who grew up with the album form being central to the cultural musical experience. The new wave of consumers, born directly into the world of high speed broadband, will have no such allegiance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Greenwald</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/comment-page-1/#comment-20532</link>
		<dc:creator>David Greenwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4019#comment-20532</guid>
		<description>Posts out of over 240 in 2009 mentioning Pitchfork: 16. And that&#039;s counting 2 on the Pitchfork Music Festival.

This is not a post about Pitchfork. It&#039;s a post about a trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posts out of over 240 in 2009 mentioning Pitchfork: 16. And that&#8217;s counting 2 on the Pitchfork Music Festival.</p>
<p>This is not a post about Pitchfork. It&#8217;s a post about a trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/comment-page-1/#comment-20531</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4019#comment-20531</guid>
		<description>Right on brother!  (David, not the last post)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on brother!  (David, not the last post)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.rawkblog.net/2009/08/critical-backlash-the-death-of-the-album/comment-page-1/#comment-20528</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rawkblog.net/?p=4019#comment-20528</guid>
		<description>Alright, but honestly, you care way too much about what Pitchfork posts.  I get the feeling you refresh Pitchfork&#039;s feed every 10 minutes, just waiting for something you can complain about.  Totes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, but honestly, you care way too much about what Pitchfork posts.  I get the feeling you refresh Pitchfork&#8217;s feed every 10 minutes, just waiting for something you can complain about.  Totes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

